David Smitherman
There can be no doubt about the fact that the role of women in almost
every area of society is changing. Like the proverbial snow ball, the movement
bringing this change began slowly in the post-World War II era and has
continued to grow and gain momentum. However, the changing roles of women
is not what concerns so many, it is but a symptom of the real issue: an
improper attitude toward God's word. With an increasing sensitivity to
what is politically and socially correct, a corresponding hardening of
the heart toward anything that God has said, and a biblical hermeneutic
that is becoming more and more culturally responsive, not only will the
roles of women encroach further into forbidden territory, there will be
no end to what changes might be made in other areas as well. Unfortunately,
there has arisen now, as in the long ago, "another generation"
that does not look with the proper regard upon God (Judg. 2:10) and consequently
is "doing their own thing" (Judg. 17:6).
The role of women in local churches
It is clear that, in the 1st century, God placed certain restrictions
upon women in many assembly and local church activities. But many brethren
today are not content with 1st century proscriptions and want expanding
roles for women in local churches in areas clearly designated as "Men
Only". The questions are whether or not "we" or God have
posted the "No Women Allowed" sign and should these respective
functions be respected or looked upon as curious instructions from another
era that can be cast aside? The answer to these questions will depend upon
whether one's "hermenutic" is objectively or subjectively based.
From those restrictions set by God there should be no deviation and for
them there should be no apology. And while it is true that some restrictions
"we" have placed on women have more to do with tradition than
Truth, let's be careful that we do not rush impulsively into change and
confuse the two.
Women in pulpits and as elders in local churches are as foreign to God's
design for the local congregation as priests from the tribe of Judah would
have been during Moses' day and for the same reason: God specified from
which tribe he wanted the priests to come (Heb. 7:11-14) and he has also
been specific regarding the gender from which he wants elders and preachers.
Cultural changes and all of the hermenutical manipulation we might engage
in won't change that a bit. If the principles in 1Cor. 14 do not apply
today and restrict women from preaching and teaching in our assemblies,
then are those in chapter 7 regarding marriage, divorce and remarriage
likewise to be ignored? And if we can somehow circumvent 1 Tim. 3:1-7 and
Tit. 1:5-9 and allow women to serve as elders, why can't we ignore Paul's
charge in 2 Tim. 4:2 and preach whatever message we feel like? The sad
truth is that in many cases brethren have been consistent and done exactly
as we've just indicated.
The role of women in the home
Shortly before his death, Dwight Eisenhower was asked to name the greatest
man he had ever known. His immediate reply was, "Winston Churchill.
But the greatest person I ever knew was my mother." Sadly, however,
the role and influence of the woman in the home has been so altered over
the past few decades that it is more and more likely that fewer and fewer
children will be able to "rise up and call her blessed" as did
Mr. Eisenhower.
Agree with it or not, God's admonition to young women to "marry,
bear children, rule the house" (1 Tim. 5:14) means that He intends
for the woman's area of emphasis to be in the home. But for a number of
years the daughters of Eve have been listening to the same voice that their
mother heard in the garden of Eden and the consequences now in our homes
are as disastrous as they were then. It is undeniable and no coincidence
whatever that we have seen declines in all areas relating to our cultural
and morals as the "traditional" (i.e., biblical) role has been
altered. But It should not take statements from former presidents and cultural
statistics to motivate mothers who are Christians to get their priorities
straight and, quite literally, set their houses in order. An increased
familiarity with such passages as Prov. 31:10-31 would be a good place
to start.
Conclusion
Several years ago I went flying with a friend who wanted to practice
instrument approaches. He deliberately flew in the clouds with no reference
point with the ground below or the sky above. He could not rely upon the
way he felt and fly safely because vertigo might tell him he was flying
inverted and cause him to change from "upside down" to "right
side up"---when in fact he would have been doing the very opposite.
Thus, all during the flight he was in constant contact with the control
tower and watched the instruments carefully, both of which told him we
were in the proper position. To have flown by feelings and ignored the
objective guidance systems would have meant sure disaster. Our instruments
and contact with the tower were our only hope for a safe flight and a "happy
landing".
As we stand on the threshold of the 21st century our society and, sadly,
brethren who ought to know better, are in much the same situation in regard
to the roles of women. Biblical principles regarding the various roles
of women which have guided us well in the past are now being ignored. Relying
more and more on subjective feelings rather than objective truth, an attempt
is being made to re-define women's roles by ignoring the Divine will. Change
is sometimes warranted---even in regard to women's roles---but when change
means departure from objective direction a certain doom is all that we
can expect. Like a plane flying in thick cloud cover with the pilot ignoring
control tower voices and his instruments, nothing but certain doom lies
ahead. Nadab and Abihu (Lev. 10), Aaron and Miriam (Num. 12), and Korah
(Num. 16) are all examples of those who decided a change was in order and
found out much to their chagrin that you don't change the Unchangeable.
Those today who are the same "sons of disobedience" and want
to change the roles and functions of women would do well to re-read and
learn from these old but valuable stories.
|